Aoyagi v. Mancini & Associates
Plaintiff then sued Mancini, previous attorney, for malpractice, fraud, and breach of fiduciary duty. The trial court sustained respondents’ demurrers to the causes of action for fraud and breach of fiduciary duty. The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of Mancini on the malpractice cause of action. The court provided two independent grounds for its ruling: the Plaintiff’s untimely motions, and (2) the Plaintiff's failed to raise any triable issue of material fact with respect to, whether Mancini caused them damage. Judgment Affirmed.
Comments on Aoyagi v. Mancini & Associates