Rozanova v. Uribe CA6
On a date undisclosed to this court, Nadejda L. Rozanova and Denis Klimov (collectively, appellants) brought suit against their neighbor, Rafael S. Uribe (respondent), and in May 2013, respondent filed a cross-complaint against appellants. In April 2015, appellants, who are self-represented, filed a motion to disqualify respondent’s counsel, Roy Gunter III (Gunter). The motion was denied. In August 2015, appellants filed a second motion to disqualify Gunter, contending that he had engaged in ethical improprieties, specifically, making a number of false and misleading statements in connection with the litigation. That motion was also denied. Appellants have sought review of this decision by appeal. (See Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. v. Tracinda Corp. (1995) 36 Cal.App.4th 1832, 1838 (MGM) [order denying motion to disqualify is an appealable order].) We will affirm.
Comments on Rozanova v. Uribe CA6