P. v. Daniel CA2/6
Anthony Daniel appeals from the judgment after the trial court found that he was a mentally disordered offender (MDO). (Pen. Code, § 2962 et seq.) Appellant’s commitment offense was felony vandalism, i.e., kicking out a police car window while the car was in motion. (§ 594, subd. (a).) Appellant contends that the evidence does not support the trial court’s finding that the offense satisfied the force or violence criterion of section 2962, subdivision (e)(2)(P) or (Q). We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Daniel CA2/6