P. v. O'Rise
Appellant challenges his convictions of failing to disclose the origin of a recording or audio-visual work and counterfeiting a registered mark. He contends that the trial court erred by imposing an upper term without submitting the factual basis for the term to the jury, and the sentence on count 2 reflected in the minute order and abstract of judgment is improper, as the trial court did not sentence him on count 2. Court concludes the trial court did not err by imposing an upper term, but it erred by failing to pronounce sentence on count 2. Count 2 reversed. Other judgments affirmed.
Comments on P. v. O'Rise