Marriage of Van Fleet & Kingery
Vicki F. Van Fleet appeals from an October 2015 order directing her former husband, respondent Donald L. Kingery, to pay child support in the amount of $411. In making the challenged order, the trial court relied on an order it issued in April 2015, imputing income to Van Fleet. Van Fleet did not appeal from that order.
Van Fleet now contends the imputation of income to her was contrary to law and unsupported by the evidence. As we explain, her failure to appeal from the April 2015 order prevents us from reviewing the correctness of the trial court’s original decision on the imputation issue. As for the matters embraced by the October 2015 order, from which Van Fleet has appealed, we conclude: (1) she has failed to show the evidence compelled a finding in her favor; and (2) her failure to appeal from the April 2015 order forecloses her from raising legal issues she might have raised in an appeal from that order. Accordingly, we will affirm the October 2015 order from which th
Comments on Marriage of Van Fleet & Kingery