legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re A.S. CA2/5
Cristina S. (mother) appeals from the jurisdictional findings and dispositional orders declaring her children, A.S. and E.S., dependents of the court under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivision (b). Mother contends the jurisdictional findings were erroneous because there was insufficient evidence her drug use and mental health issues placed the children at risk of suffering serious harm. She argues in the alternative that even if substantial evidence existed to support the jurisdictional findings, the dependency court abused its discretion by declaring the children dependents of the court because “no evidence showed the children suffered any physical harm as a result of mother’s drug use and mental health issues.”

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale