legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Aparicio
In this Proposition 47 case (Pen. Code, § 1170.18), defendant Valentine Aparicio appeals an order denying his petition for resentencing as to his conviction for receiving a stolen vehicle (§ 496d, subd. (a)). Defendant contends Proposition 47, the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act (§ 1170.18), implicitly includes the offense of receiving a stolen vehicle in violation of section 496, subdivision (a), which makes the receipt of stolen property valued at $950 or less punishable as a misdemeanor. Defendant also contends that denial of his petition for resentencing violated his equal protection rights.
We conclude a conviction for violating section 496d, subdivision (a), does not qualify for resentencing under Proposition 47. We also reject defendant’s equal protection challenge. The trial court therefore did not err in denying defendant’s petition for resentencing, and we affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale