Marriage of Scott CA3
Appellant, David G. Scott (David), appeals from an order denying his motion to modify spousal support. Appellant contends the trial court abused its discretion and erred as a matter of law in denying his motion. David’s claim of legal error is not supported by the law. David also failed to support his claims with an adequate record on appeal. He has elected to proceed on a clerk’s transcript. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.121.) Thus, the appellate record does not include a reporter’s transcript of the hearing in this matter. This is referred to as a “judgment roll” appeal. (Allen v. Toten (1985) 172 Cal.App.3d 1079, 1082-1083; Krueger v. Bank of America (1983) 145 Cal.App.3d 204, 207.) Moreover, David has omitted several documents on which the trial court relied in reaching its decision. On the face of this record, no error has been established. Accordingly, we affirm.
Comments on Marriage of Scott CA3