In re T.F. CA1/2
The juvenile court found T.F. in violation of a probation condition that he not associate with any person known to him to be a member of the Tre-Four gang. He contends this finding was unsupported by substantial evidence because the prosecution failed to present sufficient evidence that the Tre-Four gang had engaged in a pattern of criminal gang activity, an element of the Penal Code section 186.22, subdivision (e) definition of a criminal street gang. His argument lacks merit, and we affirm.
Comments on In re T.F. CA1/2