In re Matthew H. CA4/1
T.G. challenges an order terminating her parental rights under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. She contends that the court erred when it found that her son, Matthew H., was generally adoptable, and that the beneficial parent-child relationship exception to termination of parental rights did not apply. We conclude that the finding that Matthew is likely to be adopted within a reasonable time is not supported by substantial evidence and therefore reverse the judgment terminating parental rights. Accordingly, we do not reach the issue of whether the court erred when it determined that the beneficial parent-child relationship exception did not apply.
Comments on In re Matthew H. CA4/1