P. v. Scarzo CA2/2
Defendant and appellant Paul Vincent Scarzo (defendant) appeals his conviction of multiple sexual crimes. He contends that the trial court improperly terminated his pro. per. status and appointed counsel to represent him; that a juror engaged in misconduct during deliberations, and the trial court erred in denying his motion for new trial based upon the alleged misconduct; that the trial court erred in imposing consecutive sentences as to counts 1 and 2; and that the abstract of judgment and minutes of the sentencing contain clerical errors. Respondent agrees with defendant’s last assignment of error, and asks that both the minutes and abstract be corrected. While we agree that the clerical errors should be corrected, we find no merit to defendant’s remaining contentions and affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Scarzo CA2/2