P. v. Hibbard CA4/3
In this appeal, Mitchell Alan Hibbard challenges a probation condition stating, “[d]o not be in the presence of children under the age of 18, unless accompanied by a responsible adult 21 years of age or older and approved in advance by your probation or mandatory supervision officer.” Hibbard contends this probation condition is unconstitutionally vague because it lacks a knowledge (scienter) requirement. We dismiss the appeal as moot because Hibbard no longer is on probation. We decline to exercise our discretion to reach the merits of a moot appeal.
Comments on P. v. Hibbard CA4/3