Yosemite Meat and Locker Service v. Carrasco
This case involves defendant's alleged breach of a settlement agreement in which he promised not to aid anyone in suing plaintiffs. Court concludeds that the juvenile court erred in granting defendant's motion for summary judgment, the court did not abuse its discretion in granting "without prejudice" defendant's motion for a protective order shielding defendant's lawyer from being deposed or called as a witness, but must entertain a motion to lift the protective order on reman, and did not abuse its discretion in denying leave to amend the complaint. Judgment Reversed.
Comments on Yosemite Meat and Locker Service v. Carrasco