legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re A.D. CA1/1
Appellant A.D. appeals from a juvenile court order committing him to the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Division of Juvenile Facilities (DJF). Appellant contends the juvenile court improperly failed to exercise its discretion to determine whether he should be required to register as a sex offender upon his discharge from DJF. He also contends if the sex offender registration requirement is mandatory, it violates equal protection. We conclude under the circumstances of this case, the requirement that appellant register as a sex offender was mandatory. Because the registration requirement does not violate equal protection, we affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale