P. v. Sellmer CA1/3
Jacob Eugene Sellmer (appellant) appeals from a judgment entered after he pleaded guilty to vehicle theft (Veh. Code, § 10851, subd. (a)) and the trial court sentenced him to probation for three years with various conditions. He contends: (1) the court abused its discretion in imposing a probation condition requiring him to pass the General Educational Development (GED) test during his probationary period; and (2) the probation condition requiring him to obtain his probation officer’s approval before traveling outside of the state is unconstitutionally overbroad. We reject his contentions and affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Sellmer CA1/3