legal news


Register | Forgot Password

17 In re E.A. CA2/1
V.C. (Mother) appeals from the juvenile court’s jurisdiction and disposition orders made after the juvenile court adjudged her children E.A. (born in 2010) and M.A. (born in 2013) dependents under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300. Mother contends that the evidence did not support the jurisdictional findings or the disposition orders. We disagree. As we shall explain, sufficient evidence supported the court’s finding that a substantial risk of harm existed to the children because of Mother’s abuse of drugs and alcohol and that the children would not be protected without their removal from her custody. Accordingly, we affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale