legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re M.W. CA1/1
D.B. is the presumed father of M.W. At the disposition hearing, the court adjudged M.W. a dependent child and extended reunification services to both parents. D.B. accepted the reunification plan, including random drug testing, but he now objects to random testing and the additional requirements that he attend up to three NA/AA meetings a week and obtain a sponsor, complete outpatient drug counseling and, if he tests positive test for drugs, enter and complete a residential drug treatment. On the facts of this case, we agree the court abused its discretion by imposing drug counseling and residential drug treatment as a mandatory part of his reunification plan. We find the order for random testing reasonable. We therefore reverse the court’s order and strike all the treatment-related conditions save random testing, and remand to the trial court for further proceedings.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale