In re Ruben V. CA5
In 2015, a juvenile wardship petition was filed alleging appellant Ruben V. came within the provisions of Welfare and Institutions Code section 602. In April 2016, it was found true that appellant Ruben had sodomized an unconscious person, in violation of Penal Code section 286, subdivision (f). At disposition, he was placed on probation in his father’s custody. Ruben appeals, contending he was eligible for deferred entry of judgment and the juvenile court erred in not holding a suitability hearing. He also contends the juvenile court erred in not awarding predisposition custody credits against his maximum confinement time. We reject both contentions and affirm the disposition.
Comments on In re Ruben V. CA5