legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Selina C. CA2/2
Dario C. (father) filed a petition for extraordinary writ (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.452) challenging an order of the dependency court denying him family reunification services with his daughter Selina and setting a hearing pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. We deny the petition.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
At the time the detention report was filed in this matter (Oct. 31, 2016), Erica G. (mother) had eight previous dependency referrals and two open cases. She had three children, the younger two (Stephen and Selina) with Father. Selina was born in October 2016, and her older brother Stephen was born in April 2015.
Prior dependency court proceeding
The day after Stephen’s birth in April 2015, allegations of general neglect and caretaker absence were substantiated. Both mother and Stephen tested positive for amphetamines. Father, who had a lengthy criminal record, was absent due to incarceration. A section 300 petition was sustained as to S

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale