In re M.G. CA4/2
X.M. (mother) and S.G. (father) appeal from the judgment terminating their parental rights over their son, M.G. They contend the trial court erred by determining the parental benefit exception (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i)) did not apply, and argue the court should have chosen a plan less invasive of their rights than adoption. We affirm.
Comments on In re M.G. CA4/2