P. v. Eugene CA2/7
In his third appeal related to a 15-year-old judgment for multiple counts of grand theft and perjury by declaration, Demetrius Eugene challenges the trial court’s restitution order. Following a review of the record Eugene’s appointed counsel identified no meritorious issues; our own independent review of the record and analysis of the contentions presented by Eugene in two lengthy supplemental briefs similarly identified no error. We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Eugene CA2/7