Skerston v. Law Office of Robert Newman CA4/3
Appellant Paula Skerston’s current foray into the legal system began when she filed a complaint against “Law Office of Robert Newman, a Suspended Corporation” on February 19, 2015. This complaint accused respondent Robert Newman of false light invasion of privacy and infliction of emotional distress for replying to a review Skerston had posted on Yelp by stating, “In 2007, I obtained a restraining order for a client against Paula Skerston, who is an attorney: Ms. Skerston appealed the trial court’s ruling issuing a restraining order against her. Ms. Skerston lost the appeal. Read one of the court’s related rulings here,” followed by a link to a ruling. The link was to this court’s ruling of February 24, 2012. The complaint alleges, at length, that the 2007 restraining order was obtained by false statements.
Comments on Skerston v. Law Office of Robert Newman CA4/3