legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Emily M. CA4/3
Emily M. appeals from the juvenile court’s order denying her Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 petition. She sought removal from her mother Laura M.’s custody and placement in foster care just before her 18th birthday so that she would be eligible for federal funding as a nonminor dependent (§ 11400, subd. (v)(1)) under the California Fostering Connections to Success Act. (Assem. Bill No. 12 (2009-2010 Reg. Sess. (AB 12); Assem. Bill No. 212 (2011-2012 Reg. Sess.) (AB 212).) Emily contends the evidence she presented at the hearing on her section 388 petition demonstrated a risk of detriment if she remained in mother’s care and therefore compelled her removal (§ 361, subd. (c)). Her opening brief also asserts the court erred by denying her alternative request for continued dependency status under section 303. For the reasons expressed below, we dismiss the appeal as moot.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale