P. v. Tran
Defendant appeals from a judgment after a jury convicted him of conspiracy to commit first degree burglary, attempted first degree residential burglary, and street terrorism, and found true defendant committed the first two offenses for the benefit of a criminal street gang. Defendant argues that: he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to confront the witnesses against him, there were instructional errors, and there was evidentiary error. None of his contentions have merit, and court affirms the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Tran