P. v. Mathieu CA2/7
Victor Mathieu appeals from his judgment of conviction of assault with a semiautomatic firearm (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (b)) and possession of a firearm by a felon (§ 29800, subd. (a)(1)), with true findings on a great bodily injury enhancement (§ 12022.7, subd. (a)) and a firearm enhancement (§ 12022.5). On appeal, Mathieu argues that the trial court prejudicially erred when it excluded evidence of an out-of-court statement made by Mathieu’s wife in which she admitted that she, and not Mathieu, committed the shooting at issue in this case. We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Mathieu CA2/7