legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re H.B.
Father appeals from an order of the juvenile court terminating his parental relationship to his daughter under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. Father contends the juvenile court erred in (1) denying the request for a bonding study that would have determined the longterm effects that separation from her siblings would have on H.B.; (2) failing to apply the sibling relationship exception to the termination of parental rights despite acknowledging the existence of a close sibling relationship; and (3) failing to find a conflict of interest in representation of minor and her siblings, who had different permanent plans but were part of a bonded sibling set. Father further contends there was no evidence to support a finding that minor is likely to be adopted within a reasonable time. Counsel for minor joins the position of the Riverside County Department of Public Social Services urging affirmance of the order. Court found no error, and affirmed.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale