In re J.L. CA6
Multiple wardship petitions were filed against J.L. (minor). After minor was terminated from the deferred entry of judgment (DEJ) program, the juvenile court found that he came within the provisions of Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 and adjudged him a ward of the court (§ 725, subd. (b)).
On appeal from the judgment (§ 800, subd. (a)), minor raises an insufficiency of the evidence claim against the juvenile court’s finding that he violated Vehicle Code section 20002, subdivision (b), as alleged in count 2 of the petition filed on June 2, 2015. He also attacks probation conditions requiring him to submit his electronic devices and his social media sites to warrantless searches and to provide his passwords thereto as constitutionally overbroad. Minor does not challenge the substantiality of the evidence supporting the juvenile court’s findings as to the truth of other allegations contained in that petition, the propriety of its determination that he comes within th
Comments on In re J.L. CA6