P. v. Gitelman CA2/1
Marc Gitelman appeals from his conviction for three sex crimes, contending the trial court made numerous prejudicial evidentiary errors and the prosecutor committed misconduct. We disagree, and therefore affirm the judgment with a slight modification.

Comments on P. v. Gitelman CA2/1

Post Reply

Search thread for Go ►

Download thread as textHTMLGo ►

• 0/5
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment: Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

Submit Advanced