legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re K.P. CA2/4
Appellant L.P. (Mother) appeals the juvenile court’s order asserting jurisdiction over her two children, “Kal” and “Kas,” as well as the dispositional order that followed, contending the court failed to comply with the requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq., ICWA). Respondent does not contest the appeal. We have reviewed the file and found that Mother notified the Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) and the court of possible Indian heritage through her maternal grandmother and specified a tribe. There is no evidence that notices were sent. Nor is there evidence that DCFS attempted to contact the grandmother or Mother’s mother to obtain additional information about the alleged Indian heritage. Accordingly, we conditionally affirm, and remand for ICWA compliance.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale