P. v. Talamo CA6
Defendant Salvatore Talamo was ordered to pay $221,866.94 as victim restitution following his plea of no contest to embezzlement. On appeal, defendant asserts that the trial court erred because the order was not supported by substantial evidence, and that he was denied due process because the restitution hearing was not a fair proceeding. For the reasons stated here, we will affirm the order.
Comments on P. v. Talamo CA6