legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Karaaslan v. Mesa Water Dist. CA4/3
Haci E. Karaaslan appeals from the trial court’s denial of his petition for leave to file a personal injury lawsuit against Mesa Water District (the District) after the date for filing suit under the statute of limitations passed. Karaaslan’s complaint arose from an automobile accident involving a District vehicle and, after the accident, Karaaslan timely filed a claim with the District under Government Code section 911.2 (all undesignated statutory references are to this code) as a prerequisite to suing a public entity. The District sent Karaaslan a notice rejecting his claim, but included in its letter a statement suggesting the rejection was only a formality to enable the District’s insurance carrier to act on the claim. The insurer subsequently settled Karaaslan’s demand relating to property damage, but denied his ensuing demand for $28,000 in medical expenses and pain and suffering damages, relying on the expiration of the six-month statute of limitations (§ 945.6) to

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale