P. v. Estrada CA6
Defendant was sentenced to concurrent 32-month prison terms for two offenses involving unlawful possession of a firearm. He argues on appeal that the trial court erred by failing to stay imposition of sentence for one of those offenses under Penal Code section 654. The Attorney General counters that defendant has abandoned his claim under California Rules of Court, rule 4.412(b) because he agreed to a specific prison term and he did not object to the imposition of concurrent sentences in the trial court. We will dismiss this appeal as moot because defendant has fully served his sentence, and resolution of the issue presented will have no practical effect on him.
Comments on P. v. Estrada CA6