legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Carranza CA6
Defendant Alvaro Carranza appeals from a judgment entered following his guilty plea to misdemeanor infliction of corporal injury on a spouse/cohabitant (Pen. Code, § 273.5, subd. (a)), and his no contest pleas to misdemeanor violation of a protective order (Pen. Code § 166, subd. (c)(1)), and felony theft of multiple identifying information (Pen. Code § 530.5, subd. (c)(3). Further statutory references are to this code.)
On appeal, defendant asserts that the trial court erred in imposing four gang-related conditions of probation, because his crimes were not related to gang affiliation. Defendant also argues that one of the probation conditions is unconstitutionally overbroad, because it impacts his First Amendment right to attend court proceedings. Finding no error, we will affirm the judgment for the reasons stated here.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale