legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re D.W. CA1/5
Appellant D.W. was declared a ward of the juvenile court under Welfare and Institutions Code section 602, based on a finding that he and another youth had committed a second degree robbery. (Pen. Code, §§ 211, 212.5, subd. (c).) He contends: (1) the judgment must be reversed because the record does not contain substantial evidence he took the property in question by means of force or fear; (2) the trial court erroneously considered evidence of an incriminating hearsay statement made by his nontestifying codefendant in violation of his right to confrontation under the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution; and (3) the juvenile court erroneously considered evidence that his codefendant was carrying a replica handgun in his pocket at the time of their arrest. We affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale