P. v. Agramont CA4/1
In this case appellant Jorge Alberto Agramont appeals from a judgment which includes an award of $365,000 in noneconomic restitution to the victim of a child molestation offense. Appellant contends the award of restitution for psychological damage was not supported by the evidence and that the amount selected by the court is excessive and "shocks the conscience." We will find the trial court's decision was rational, based upon a reasoned assessment of the facts and was well within the court's discretion. Therefore, we will affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Agramont CA4/1