P. v. Ngo CA4/3
A jury convicted Quy Ngoc Ngo of second degree robbery (Pen. Code, §§ 211/212.5, subd. (c) [count 1]; all statutory citations are to the Penal Code)). The jury also found Ngo committed the robbery against a victim he knew or should have known was 65 years of age or older (§ 667.9, subd. (a)), and personally inflicted great bodily injury (§ 12022.7, subd. (a)). Ngo contends trial counsel performed ineffectively by failing to seek suppression of the victim’s pretrial field identification, which he argues violated his due process rights because it was the product of impermissible suggestion. For the reasons expressed below, we affirm.
Comments on P. v. Ngo CA4/3