Audette v. Kwon CA2/1
Kwon contends that his customer agreement with E*TRADE, which contained a provision requiring arbitration of claims, was an illegal contract because E*TRADE failed to inform Kwon of federal laws and regulations pertaining to verification of a customer’s identity and violated his rights by sequestering the funds he deposited.

Comments on Audette v. Kwon CA2/1

Post Reply

Search thread for Go ►

Download thread as textHTMLGo ►

• 0/5
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment: Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

Submit Advanced