In re S.R. CA4/3
Mother appeals from an order terminating her parental rights. She contends the court erred in finding her child, S.R., does not come under the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA). In particular, she argues the social worker performed an inadequate investigation resulting in incomplete notices to the relevant tribes. She also contends the evidence compelled a finding that the parent-child-benefit exception applied and that, as a result, her parental rights should not have been terminated. We affirm.
Comments on In re S.R. CA4/3