legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Solsby v. Plaza Bank CA4/3
Donald Solsby appeals from a judgment following the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant Plaza Bank (the Bank)—Solsby’s former employer—on a claim for breach of the Bank’s obligation to pay him a bonus.
Solsby originally sued the Bank, which is insured by the Federal Depository Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and is thus subject to its regulation, alleging it had breached the terms of his severance agreement in two ways: first, when the Bank failed to pay him $165,000 owed in connection with the Bank’s “change in control;” and second, when it failed to pay him an additional $165,000 owed as a consequence of the termination of his employment. However, in a prior opinion, we affirmed the trial court’s summary adjudication of Solsby’s claim for the latter payment, which qualified as a prohibited “golden parachute” under title 12 United States Code section 1828(k). (Solsby v. Plaza Bank (Feb. 17, 2015, G049272) [nonpub. opn.] (Solsby I).

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale