P. v. Aguirre CA2/1
Defendant and appellant Omar Alejandro Aguirre challenges his conviction for resisting an executive officer in the performance of his duty. He contends that the trial court erred by instructing the jury that voluntary intoxication was not a defense. We affirm.

Comments on P. v. Aguirre CA2/1

Post Reply

Search thread for Go ►

Download thread as textHTMLGo ►

• 0/5
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment: Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

Submit Advanced