Fuller v. Harris CA3
Nicholas Harris, who is appearing in pro. per., appeals a three-year restraining order prohibiting him from harassing his ex-girlfriend and housemate, Linda Ann Fuller. (Domestic Violence Prevention Act (DVPA); Fam. Code, §6200 et seq.) Unfamiliar with the principles of law governing the trial court’s ruling and the limited scope of appellate review, Harris lodges 18 arguments, some only marginally coherent, expressing his frustration with his ex-girlfriend and the trial court and his apparent belief he has been misunderstood and mistreated throughout proceedings he characterizes as unfair. We have attempted to synthesize his arguments into cogent and cognizable legal issues to the extent possible. We conclude the arguments are without merit, and affirm.
Comments on Fuller v. Harris CA3