legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Raquel A. CA1/2
At a disposition hearing on two sustained juvenile wardship petitions, counsel for minor Raquel A. requested that the matter be set for a contested hearing. The juvenile court granted the request but also stated it “would like Raquel to go into the Girls in Motion program and to get started forthwith.” It thus ordered her remanded pending the contested hearing. At the contested hearing two weeks later, the court heard evidence and argument, after which it ordered Raquel to complete the Girls in Motion program. On appeal, Raquel contends the court deprived her of due process by predetermining her disposition before hearing evidence at the contested disposition hearing. While the court committed error by remanding Raquel prior to the contested hearing, her constitutional right to due process was not violated and she did not suffer prejudice. We thus affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale