legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re L.A. CA3
C.A., the mother of the minors L.A. and S.M., appeals from the juvenile court’s orders denying her petition for modification and terminating her parental rights. (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 366.26, 388, 395.) She contends the juvenile court committed reversible errors in denying her petition for modification, failing to apply the beneficial parental relationship exception, and denying her request for a bonding study. Mother also argues that having both minors being represented by the same counsel created an actual conflict of interest requiring reversal. We shall affirm the juvenile court’s orders.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale