P. v. Walker CA2/5
In this appeal from defendant Robert Walker’s (defendant’s) conviction on multiple counts of human trafficking and other charged offenses, the issues we consider require us to discuss the meaning of the word “sex”; the admissibility of video evidence depicting defendant congregating with another individual identified as a pimp; whether defendant’s attorney was constitutionally ineffective by not seeking to exclude victim testimony as tainted by asserted governmental misconduct; and whether defendant can be found to have acted with separate objectives in sexually assaulting one of his victims and then forcing her to work for him as a prostitute.
Comments on P. v. Walker CA2/5