Ashcraft v. Challenger Sheet Metal CA4/2
Joseph Ashcraft and Jacob Sharp brought a wage and hour suit against their employer, Challenger Sheet Metal, Inc. (Company). The trial court denied Company’s motion to compel arbitration. Company contends the trial court erred because (1) the arbitration agreement was effective through all periods of Ashcraft’s and Sharp’s employment; (2) the arbitration agreement does not contain a condition precedent; (3) the arbitration agreement is not unconscionable; and (4) the arbitrator should decide the enforceability of the arbitration agreement. We reverse the judgment.
Comments on Ashcraft v. Challenger Sheet Metal CA4/2