In re J.D. CA2/6
The San Luis Obispo District Attorney filed an amended juvenile wardship petition (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 602, former subd. (a)) alleging that appellant J.D. committed the felony offense of making criminal threats (Pen. Code, § 422, subd. (a)) and the misdemeanor offense of altering the appearance of an imitation firearm (id. § 20150). Appellant admitted the misdemeanor charge. The felony charge was dismissed, but the parties agreed that it could be considered as true for purposes of the disposition hearing.
Appellant was declared a ward of the juvenile court and placed on probation. On appeal, he contends that two of his probation terms are unconstitutional. Specifically, he contests Term 22, which requires that he “[s]ubmit to search of any electronic devices used to store or transmit information that you own, possess, or control, at any time, with or without probable cause, by probation or law enforcement; to include . . . ‘password[s] for purpose of identifying posse
Comments on In re J.D. CA2/6