legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Gaddis CA3
Defendant Justice Gaddis contends (1) there was insufficient evidence to support imposing a gang enhancement on his conviction of being a felon in possession of a firearm and (2) the trial court abused its discretion when it sentenced him to the upper prison term for assault with a firearm and a consecutive upper term for a firearm enhancement. We disagree with defendant’s contentions and, except to order the abstract of judgment be corrected, we affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale