P. v. Gaddis CA3
Defendant Justice Gaddis contends (1) there was insufficient evidence to support imposing a gang enhancement on his conviction of being a felon in possession of a firearm and (2) the trial court abused its discretion when it sentenced him to the upper prison term for assault with a firearm and a consecutive upper term for a firearm enhancement. We disagree with defendant’s contentions and, except to order the abstract of judgment be corrected, we affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Gaddis CA3