P. v. Meza CA1/1
A jury convicted defendant Juan Meza of false imprisonment, infliction of corporal injury on a person in a dating relationship, and assault with a deadly weapon, and the trial court sentenced him to five years and eight months in prison. On appeal, he contends that the court erred by admitting his prior conviction for unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor as impeachment evidence because (1) that offense is not a crime involving moral turpitude and (2) the evidence was unduly prejudicial under Evidence Code section 352 (section 352). We disagree with both contentions and affirm.
Comments on P. v. Meza CA1/1