legal news


Register | Forgot Password

CSAC Excess Ins. Co. v. CA Ins. Guarantee Assn.
Plaintiff CSAC Excess Insurance Authority (hereafter CSAC), a joint powers authority (see Gov. Code, § 6500 et seq.) formed to cover the workers’ compensation obligations of its member counties through a combination of risk retention and excess insurance, ultimately sought a declaration in the present action that its workers’ compensation payments for two of its members in excess of the agreed retention ($500,000) with a now defunct insurer—the Protective National Insurance Company of Omaha (hereafter Protective)—are within the statutory definition of unpaid “covered claims” that defendant California Insurance Guarantee Association (hereafter CIGA) has an obligation to reimburse (Ins. Code, § 1063 et seq.). On stipulated facts, CSAC sought summary judgment. The trial court issued a ruling in February 2016 that CIGA had breached its statutory duty to reimburse CSAC for the excess workers’ compensation coverage due under the Protective policy.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale