P. v. Vega CA6
Defendant Francisco ChislomVega appeals his conviction following a plea bargain asserting that his prior juvenile adjudication for assault with a deadly weapon (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(1)) was improperly used to enhance his sentence as a strike.
On appeal, defendant concedes that we are bound by People v. Nguyen (2009) 46 Cal.4th 1007 (Nguyen), wherein our Supreme Court held that prior juvenile adjudications may be used to increase a sentence under the “Three Strikes” law without violating the right to a jury trial. He brings this appeal to preserve his federal appellate rights.
Comments on P. v. Vega CA6